Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered strong operations: oil and gas production beat guidance ranges, capex came in below midpoint, GAAP EPS was $0.68 and adjusted EPS was $0.80; management reduced 2025 capex by ~$100M and tightened 2025 production ranges .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, adjusted EPS modestly beat ($0.80 vs $0.796*), while revenue and EBITDA (Adj. EBITDAX proxy) were below ($1.904B vs $2.029B*; $1.337B vs $1.383B*)—derivative losses (-$112M) depressed reported operating revenues and EBITDA-like metrics . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Guidance: 2025 capex lowered to $2.0–$2.3B (from $2.1–$2.4B) and Q2 2025 production guided to 710–760 MBoed; oil midpoint maintained while gas and BOE midpoints raised; dividend set at $0.22 and balance sheet priority is deleveraging $1.0B term loans in 2025 .
- Catalyst: Reallocation from oil to gas (Permian rigs cut, Marcellus rigs added), explicit deleveraging plan, and remediation of Windham Row Harkey wells with confidence in fix; medium-term free cash flow focus and optionality across basins .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Production outperformed: total 747 MBoed near high end; gas 3,044 MMcfpd above high end; oil 141.2 MBopd ~2% above midpoint .
- Capital discipline: incurred capex $552M vs $525–$625M guidance lower half; Q1 FCF $663M; unit operating costs tightly managed at $9.97/boe .
- Strategic flexibility and balance sheet: cutting Permian rigs to 7 in H2, adding Marcellus rigs; plan to retire $1.0B term loans; “Coterra is an arc, not a party boat,” emphasizing resilience through cycles .
What Went Wrong
- Reported revenue/EBITDA below consensus, driven by non-cash derivative losses (-$112M) lowering operating revenues to $1.904B and pressuring EBITDA-like measures vs expectations .
- Windham Row Harkey wells had mechanical/cementing issues leading to increased water production and deferred projects; remediation underway and volumes excluded from 2025 guidance ramp .
- Unit operating cost rose sequentially ($9.97/boe in Q1 vs $8.89/boe in Q4), reflecting mix shift to oilier assets with higher per-unit LOE (but with strong margins) .
Financial Results
Segment and regional operations (production):
KPIs:
Consensus vs Actual (Q1 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Guidance Changes
Key drivers: reduce Permian rigs to 7 in H2 (cut ~$150M Permian capex); add/extend 2 Marcellus rigs (add $50M, with option +$50M) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The company's top-tier balance sheet, diversified portfolio… and low reinvestment rate position Coterra to prosper throughout cyclical commodity price environments.” — Tom Jorden .
- “We are lowering Permian investment… and added two natural gas-focused rigs in the Marcellus… These decisions… bolster free cash flow… and allow us to maintain oil production guidance while slightly increasing natural gas and BOE volumes.” — Tom Jorden .
- “Coterra is an arc, not a party boat… tailor made to ride out this storm and thrive in it.” — Tom Jorden .
- “Our priority is going to be debt repayment… buybacks will be back-end weighted… focused on quickly getting our leverage back to ~0.5x net debt-to-EBITDA.” — Shane Young .
- “Harkey wells… due to behind pipe water flow… a near wellbore mechanical issue… fixable… remediation solutions underway.” — Tom Jorden .
Q&A Highlights
- Harkey remediation: cementing/wellbore isolation fix in Windham Row; volumes excluded from guidance with remediation timeline of months, not weeks .
- Production trajectory: large sequential oil ramp in H2; Q2 oil ~5 kbpd below earlier expectations due to program updates, but annual oil midpoint maintained .
- Capital allocation amid macro: if oil/gas ratio stays wide, Coterra will reallocate toward highest returns across basins; capex “guided missile” approach .
- Power offtake and capacity: growing interest in Permian/Marcellus power deals and data centers; Waha-based generation attractive; Constitution Pipeline developments monitored .
- Shareholder returns: ≥50% of annual FCF through cycles, but 2025 prioritizes deleveraging; opportunistic buybacks likely back-end weighted .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 adjusted EPS beat consensus ($0.80 vs $0.796*)—driven by stronger gas realizations (+64% QoQ) and production beats; GAAP operating revenues missed consensus ($1.904B vs $2.029B*) largely due to non-cash derivative loss (-$112M) included in reported revenues . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- EBITDA (Adj. EBITDAX proxy) missed ($1.337B vs $1.383B*) as mix and hedging impacted reported figures despite operational strength . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Near-term estimate revisions likely: raise gas/BOE trajectory midpoints (per updated guidance), maintain oil trajectory; incorporate lower FY25 capex and deleveraging; Q2 guidance implies lower oil than February guide but stronger H2 ramp .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operational execution strong across basins; pivot to Upper Wolfcamp mitigates Harkey issues without sacrificing 2025 oil guidance .
- Flex-first capital allocation: Permian rigs cut; Marcellus rigs added; FY25 capex lowered to $2.0–$2.3B—improves capital efficiency and FCF resilience .
- Balance sheet priority: active deleveraging with $250M repaid in Q1 and plan to retire $1.0B term loans in 2025; buybacks to be opportunistic and back-end weighted .
- Gas leverage building: gas production midpoint raised; longer laterals and $800/ft cost structure enhance Marcellus returns; optional +$50M capex later in 2025 .
- Reported revenue/EBITDA misses vs consensus reflect hedge losses; monitor estimate methodologies (GAAP vs pre-hedge) when benchmarking .
- Q2 guide sets lower near-term oil but strong H2 ramp; track Harkey remediation progress and Wolfcamp TIL cadence as key drivers for H2 oil exit rate .
- Medium term: diversified commodity mix, discipline on reinvestment (~50%) and optional LNG/power contracts position Coterra for sustained FCF through cycles .